One would hope that if a Canadian trial judge is going to quote or paraphrase any summary of Supreme Court of Canada law, the trial judge would use the Supreme Court’s own summary. This doesn’t require a Homer Simpson palm slap to the forehead for emphasis.
That didn’t happen, again, in a decision a judge of the British Columbia Supreme Court. Instead, the trial judge used something else from somewhere else that, by almost 4 years after the SCC decision that established the law, should be known to be wrong even in the remotest regions of British Columbia.
And why some lawyers and many members of the public are sardonic about the profession.
This wouldn’t happen at your law firm, right?
All of our your lawyers aren’t this … challenged.
Or, where you still have a library with real books, and people who act as librarians rather than merely hands to file updates, they’re sufficiently able.
For you, because you strive for excellence, ‘mediocrity ‘r us’ is somebody else in another office.
Rumours of a possible appearnce of a Vulcan-like entity in the Woodstock era might be related to this image that captures a late 1968 or early 1969 incident somewhere in downtown Toronto in the bowels of a CBC television studio.
A friend who should know better said “Rick Moranis” in the early 1980s.
Nah. Well, except maybe the last image a bit. Except for touque, and the hair, and the not so bright appearance. And the plaid lumberjack shirt.
But I’d not have complained at all about the company.